Creative Commons Attributions-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: http://doi.org/10.6092/UNIBO/IGCYRGVCYR and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation.
Small fragment of a
Bought by the Norton mission from an Arab on February 16th, 1911 at
Seen by H. De Cou between the date of purchase and his own death on March 11st, 1911 at
Seems to be lost.
Marked-up according to the EpiDoc Guidelines version 8
We follow J.M. Reynolds for the suggested date.
This very fragmentary inscription has been included into the verse collection on behalf of only two tiny hints: the plausible
Another problematic aspect is the name
Metrical analysis: dactylic fragments which it is impossible to connect with a specific verse or place in the verse, but for one case mentioned above. At least, it is clear that the layout of lines on the stone was not consistent with the ends of verses.