Creative Commons Attributions-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: http://doi.org/10.6092/UNIBO/IGCYRGVCYR and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation.
Fragment of a white
Found before 1935 at
Seen by Pugliese Carratelli in 1960 in
Seen by C. Dobias-Lalou in 1976 in the same museum.
Marked-up according to the EpiDoc Guidelines version 8
col. a: intraduisible (finales de génitif de patronymes).
col. b:
col. a: not usefully translatable (endings of genitive of fathers' names).
col. b:
col. a: intraducibile (finali di genitivi di patronimici).
col. b:
The names in column b, although not complete, were at the nominative case. They were probably followed by their fathers' names, as shown by the endings preserved in column a, of which only 1 or 2 letters survive and are not translatable.
At b.4 the space available allows only to restore a final sigma. Hence a name
At b.6 Oliverio and Pugliese Carratelli did not restore any ending for this name. The space available allows one letter, which is impossible for a nominative (there are only masculine names in the list), or two letters out of which an iota. The produced name is hitherto unknown. The omicron instead of the predictable omega in the third syllable is not impossible at a late Hellenistic date.
At line 11 the third letter is definitely an omicron, followed by what may pertain to a tau. Hence our restoration with a name already attested.
The name of line 12 in column b may be supplied as
From the layout and style of the lettering, it seems plausible that we have here a list of ephebes mentioned as dedicants for Hermes and Heracles, as proposed by