Perhaps a <rs type="textType">list of ephebes</rs> Inscriptions of Greek Cyrenaica Università di Bologna IGCyr095100 738458 igcyr095100 https://igcyr.unibo.it/igcyr095100

Creative Commons Attributions-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: http://doi.org/10.6092/UNIBO/IGCYRGVCYR and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation.

 Cyrene Museum 299

Fragment of white marble block broken on all sides except probably at back ( 0.105 0.16 0.11 ).

 Inscribed on front face. 0.01; finely cut, with serifs, pi with wide upper bar, open upsilon. Findspot. End of second or beginning of first century B.C.

Found before 1935 at Cyrene: exact findspot unrecorded.

Seen by C. Dobias-Lalou in 1976 in Shahat: Cyrene Museum.

Marked-up according to the EpiDoc Guidelines version 8

Digital or digitized photographs Digitized other representations Arabic English French German Ancient Greek Transliterated Greek Modern Greek Hebrew Italian Latin Cyrenaica Libya ... Transcription from stone (CDL). checked overall check; added to bibliography and amended tagging and apparatus lemma, text, apparatus, translation, commentary checked, updated and in case corrected physDesc, history, and textClass moved text-constituted-from to profileDesc/creation mailmerged from IGCYR catalogo unificato
Bibliography

XI.7, whence SECir, 19 (no image); , pp. 216-218 (photo), whence SEG, 53.2047 . Cf. , p. 254 (ph.).

Text ιμναν Ἐπικ Πραξι Καλλίππου λου Ποσειδ
Apparatus

ιμναν Ἀν Ἐπικ Ἐπικυρτ Ἐπικύδης Πραξι Πραξ Καλλίππου Κάλλιππος λου Ξοῦθος Ποσειδ Ποσειδ

Liste de bribes de noms au génitif, intraduisible

A list of parts of names at the genitive case, not usefully translatable

Una lista di parti di nomi al genitivo, intraducibile

Commentary

The script is very similar to that of IRCyr C.295, although both fragments do not match together. Therefore, this one should be one of the latest inscriptions presumably dating of the Hellenistic period and it might explain the use of koine at least in some names.

Both for reasons of layout and because at l. 5 there is a gap after the upsilon, it is impossible to admit with Oliverio that the preserved names were at the nominative case. They should be at the genitive as fathers' names.

According to , p. 254 , this might be a list of ephebes, but too fragmentary to allow any confidence.